Blackboard Win Becomes A Loss. Maybe.



I wrote briefly that Blackboard had won its patent infringement suit against rival Desire2Learn back in late February. But then not so long after, the patent itself was rejected by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office on reexamination.

Legal battles and the system being what they are, even that is not final. Blackboard plans to keep at their case, but Desire2Learn and the
Software Freedom Law Center see the latest decision by the USPTO as a victory.

Rather than play legal interpreter here, I'll recommend that you read an interview with Blackboard Chief Legal Officer Matthew Small

posted today by Campus Technology. It gets into Blackboard's "Alcorn" patent and this "reexamination" in more detail.

As David Nagel says in his preface to the transcript, "...there are subtleties involved here that simply can't be summarized--subtleties in the patent law, in the history of software patents, in the arguments involved for and against Blackboard's patent, and in the claims in Blackboard's patent itself."

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

Comments

Display comments as Linear | Threaded

No comments

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
BBCode format allowed
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.
To leave a comment you must approve it via e-mail, which will be sent to your address after submission.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA